CREATORS JOBS BRANDS VIBECHECK
OUR CREATORS

Meet the people behind the posts.

Our most talent-matched creators - ranked by content fit, audience intent and shares. Brands pick from this pool for every campaign.

Join the network →
SK
TikTok
★ Top match
Sarah Koh
@sarahkoh.eats
FoodLifestyle
14.2K
Followers
9.1K
Avg views
8.3%
Eng.
High intentVisual fit
MT
TikTok
Marcus Tan
@marcuseats.sg
FoodTravel
22.8K
Followers
11.4K
Avg views
6.1%
Eng.
High intentVisual fit
JL
Instagram
Jade Lim
@jadeonthego
LifestyleFood
38.5K
Followers
19.2K
Avg views
4.8%
Eng.
Med intentVisual fit
RP
TikTok
Rachel Png
@racheleatslah
FoodBeauty
8.9K
Followers
6.8K
Avg views
11.2%
Eng.
High intentVisual partial
DW
TikTok
Darren Wong
@darrenwonggg
LifestyleFinance
51.3K
Followers
28.1K
Avg views
3.9%
Eng.
Low intentVisual partial
PN
Instagram
Priya Nair
@priyacooks
FoodHome
17.4K
Followers
12.6K
Avg views
7.8%
Eng.
High intentVisual fit
WL
TikTok
Wei Liang
@weieatss
FoodTech
29.1K
Followers
14.0K
Avg views
5.5%
Eng.
High intentVisual fit
Browse all 120+ creators →
Sample Report · VibeCheck
"Day 1 of building my SaaS in public"
TikTok · @samplecreator · 2:16 · 48K views
Viral Scorecard
Metric Score Fix What it means
Overall Virality Potential 35/100 → 76/100
  • 2min 16s duration and static talking-head shots from 52s onward make this video forgettable for TikTok’s fast-paced feed
Skip Risk HIGH → MEDIUM
  • Text: “THIS” implies Creator Talking About Project at 0s
  • Talking-head formats with text overlays have 150M+ templates, engagement down 30% vs 2024
  • ~70% of viewers swipe within 2s of format recognition
3s Hook (30%) 40/100 → 78/100
  • Rapid-fire text at 0s is overwhelming and fails to create immediate curiosity
Reveal / Wow Factor (23%) 68/100 → 82/100
  • Reveal of product at 29s is clear
  • Lacks a strong visual or emotional punch to make it truly surprising
Share + Comment Trigger (20%) 50/100 → 68/100
  • Niche focus limits broad shareability
  • Relatable entrepreneurial theme
Pacing & Momentum (15%) 30/100 → 88/100
  • 70s static shot from 52s–122s creates a significant dead zone
  • Viewers drop off
Platform Fit (12%) 55/100 → 85/100
  • 2min 16s length and slow, static talking-head format are mismatched for TikTok’s short-form, dynamic aesthetic
Top 3 Priority Fixes
#1 Shorten Video & Add Visuals
Now: 52.0s–122.0s: 70-second static medium shot of sample creator at desk. Video is 2min 16s long.
Fix: Cut video to under 60s; replace static shot 52s–122s with dynamic B-roll or UI footage.
Why: Videos over 90s with static visuals see 70%+ drop-off after 45s.
#2 Improve Hook & Pattern Interrupt
Now: 0.0s–3.0s: Rapid-fire text overlay over smiling sample creator.
Fix: Open with a quick 0.5s UI flash of the product, then ‘DAY 1’ text over creator.
Why: Pattern interrupts increase 3s retention by 25% vs generic intros.
#3 Enhance Shareability & CTA
Now: 120s–133s: General call to follow and visit website in bio.
Fix: Add a direct question at 120s: ‘What’s your biggest struggle? Comment below!’
Why: Direct questions increase comment rates by 3x and signal engagement to algorithm.
↥
Drop to analyse
MP4 or MOV · Max 500 MB · Max 1 min 30 sec